Sample evidence
Generated on load by the same code that produces a customer's report, over a three-asset sample library: one lecture with a gap in the middle, one seminar captioned properly, and one video with no captions at all.
WCAG 2.1 Level AA: 1 partially supports, 1 not evaluated. 2 of 3 assets evaluated, 1 not evaluated.
This report is generated from caption files alone. It can establish that a caption track is present, complete against its own timeline, correctly formed, and unaltered by processing. It cannot establish that captions match the spoken audio, cover live output, or sit clear of on-screen information, because those need the audio and the video. Criteria in that category are marked Not Evaluated with the reason, rather than assumed.
| Criterion | Level | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2.2Captions (Prerecorded) | Partially Supports | 2 assets evaluated. 1 did not meet this criterion; per-asset findings are listed below. A caption file proves captions exist, and can show they start late or skip stretches of the programme. It cannot prove they cover all audio, because that comparison needs the audio.
|
| 1.2.4Captions (Live) | Not Evaluated | Not evaluated. Live captioning is a property of the broadcast, not of a delivered file. Nothing in a sidecar can settle it. Answer it from your own production process rather than treating the blank as Not Applicable. |
Listed rather than quietly dropped. A report that omits the assets it could not read is not a report about the library.